Arizona Anti-Deficiency Overview – An Asset Protection Road-map

As we have discussed often in this forum, Asset Protection NOT just about lawsuits, it’s increasingly about any source of loss, risk or exposure to your hard earned wealth.

In some cases your assets themselves, like real estate, create the liability we are concerned about. Given the carnage in the real estate market over the last few years, especially in the Southwest, knowing what you are signing and which of your assets are affected is half the battle. Think of all the wealthy peoplel you may know that lost some or all of their assets over the last few years and the need for this education become even more clear.

This article summarizes Arizona’s mortgage deficiency protections for residential property owners. It provides a description of the foreclosure process, real estate security instruments, and the types of properties and loans that may qualify for deficiency protection.

 

Attorney Gregory Hague, Phoenix

It was authored by attorney Gregory Hague, who’s name you may recognize from his many successful years in the real estate business in Phoenix, Scottsdale and Paradise Valley. Greg has combined that invaluable experience with his legal practice and now handles a variety of real estate related legal issues as a partner at the Phoenix Arizona law firm of Stinson Morrison Hecker, LLP. – Ike Devji

Read Greg’s Article: http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=506b99dc-f20e-4c3b-9b63-cfe9c32e53af

Learn more about attorney Greg Hague and his firm or get his contact info here: https://www.stinson.com/GregHague/

Short Sale Time Bomb Affects all Buyers and sellers as Mortgage Debt Relief Act Expires – 2012

Asset Protection is increasingly broadening in what people want from it, it’s not just about litigation and must include an analysis of ALL risks to our clients’ wealth including those posed by debt, investments, taxes, insurance gaps and most notably over the last 5 years, real estate. Below, Realtor Alex Goldstein, who has helped many navigate the most treacherous business waters in America, the real estate market in the Southwest, shares some startling details on a clock that’s ticking that even most lawyers don’t know about. – Ike Devji

Real Estate Time Bomb Affects ALL Buyers and Sellers in 2012

by Alex Goldstein, LuxeAZ.com

There is a ticking time bomb in the real estate market that’s going to blow up at the end of 2012, and this looming deadline will make a major impact by mid-year. Nobody is talking about it because it’s so big, everyone just wants to bury their heads in the sand,and pretend it’s going to go away. But this major shift is coming on December 31st, 2012, like it or not.

 The problem lies, as many problems do, in Washington. In an effort to reduce thesuffering of underwater homeowners, the politicians passed the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act in 2007.

 This law has eliminated the tax burden associated with short sales and foreclosures for most homeowners. Prior to this law, if you were forgiven debt, you owed tax – the forgiven debt is counted as income. But thanks to the enactment of this law, income tax liabilities are extinguished for the vast majority of short sales and foreclosures.

This law, which is critical to distressed sales throughout the country, is set to expire on December 31, 2012. Expect to see the chaos begin by mid year. This change affects everyone, buyers and sellers alike. In Maricopa County in 2011, 60% of the homes sold were distressed properties. So what would happen if all short sales went away? What would happen if the number of bank foreclosures dropped dramatically as well? Both buyers and sellers are soon going to have a dramatically reduced set of options from what they have today.

There is no credible plan to extend the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act. This is an election year, and there’s a huge budget crisis. So there is a very real and likely chance the year will end without any extension of this law.

That means that anyone who is short selling a home, or who is foreclosed upon, starting in January 2013, will be looking at a huge tax bill. Now, don’t you think the banks are going to use this to their advantage? You can expect the already crazy roller coaster of short sales to get crazier and crazier as we get closer to this deadline.

The banks have been playing hardball on short sales as much as possible, and they will soon have an 800 pound gorilla in their pocket. It’s a very simple proposition that the banks will be making: pay us now, or pay the IRS a lot more later. As much as people loathe the banks, they surely fear the IRS more.

Buyers: If you are planning to buy a home this year, there is a 35% chance that the home you want will be a short sale. Short sales are already treacherous and time-consuming. As we near this deadline, expect to see them get vastly more difficult, with banks making tough demands that neither buyers nor sellers will like.

Sellers: the bottom line is that if you’re thinking about selling your home, and you are underwater, you had better do it now or plan to hold for the very long term. If you have to sell after the expiration of the Mortgage Forgiveness Relief Act you could be making an enormous financial mistake.

In sum, you do NOT want to be starting a short sale in the 2nd half of 2012, not as a buyer nor as a seller. If there is even a modest chance that you want to buy a home this year, start writing offers and negotiating now.

 If you are “thinking about selling” then get a proposal from an experienced agent today. The longer you wait, the greater the risk. The only thing they could change this scenario is if Washington decides to extend this law past the end of 2012. It is very difficult to imagine them doing this before the election. So that means that any relief, if it comes at all, would not be until the 11th hour. Thus, even if the law is eventually changed, expect pandemonium in short sales in the second half of this year.

Furthermore, if the law isn’t extended, there will be a lot of people who will be forced to hold onto their properties much longer than they wanted to do so. While they would like to sell, it will be more expensive for them to pay the taxes than to just hang in there.

That would mean a major decrease in inventory – both short sales and foreclosures would be dramatically reduced. The whole foundation of “strategic default” – walking away from a home and letting the bank deal with the problem – is about to go away. This has been a major driver of the real estate market for the past several years, and thus the absence of these transactions will represent a major shift.

In conclusion, whether you’re a buyer or seller, your options may be changing dramatically as we approach year end – and even more dramatically next year, if the status quo remains in Washington.

Alex Goldstein is with Realty One Group, and represents buyers and sellers of luxury real estate in Paradise Valley, Scottsdale, Arcadia, and the Biltmore. He can be reached at (480) 442-7325 or via email at alex@luxeaz.com or you can learn more here: www.LuxeAZ.com

SCAM – “Brokers” and ‘Up Front Fees’ for Venture Capital

This is a guest column by Greg George, a professional due diligence expert that I use as a resource. There are a huge number of people looking for financing due to the current lending climate and the bad guys know it. Here’s what one expert has to say.

Yours, Ike


Risk and Threat Management – Presented by Greg George

Posted in Awareness by gtiadvisors on January 7, 2010

I’ve been monitoring what appears to be the longest discussion string in LinkedIn history (up to 223 comments now) going on at the Private Equity and Venture Capital Group.

The discussion question is: What do you think about ‘up front’ fees..? (for funding a deal)

There has been very good information posted, there has been very bad information posted, smart ass comments and bullying here and there (yes, very professional), those postulating their own ‘expertise’ – “…this is how good I am, I’ve done these $20mm+ deals, and…” etc etc (never tout yourself as an expert, it diminishes your credibility – If you’re worth the recognition, others will do that for you), and I’ve even seen a few spamming in trying to sell their services/deals – astonishing…

A few thoughts on ‘brokers’ and other middle men/women requiring fees ‘up front’ – usually under the guise of due diligence work that needs to be done, we have to better position your business plan and pro-forma’s, along with all the assurances and window dressings of how they will get your deal funded – these are great sales people, and most are frauds.

You’ll never get to a closing, they will stall and stall and stall… for months – and you may never see the ‘up front’ fees you gave them again.
If you think an alternative financing or equity funding program might be the right deal for you, at minimum, at least find out:

•Who these people really are
•Talk to several past success deal client references they ’should’ provide
•Who do they represent as potential investors on your behalf
•What are the sources of funds (don’t get sucked in to a money laundering or tax evasion racket)
See if the person and firm are even licensed in the U.S: do a FINRA broker check.

FSA (UK) – also provides alert lists of EU and other international players in the finance and equity funding game not registered or vetted.

Another growing dimension of these economic times, new groups and angel investors charging ‘up front’ fees just to hear your pitch – a good example of what’s going on with these guys see: VentureHype (a great resource for many VC, Angel, start-up and investing topics) – the article also links to a well done ‘rant’ by Jason Calacanis on these practices.

Bottom line 1: If you do not have the expertise and require consulting help to get your business plan, pro-forma’s, your perfect 7-slide ppt for your pitch, and everything else up to speed (and rehearsed many times) to be received as an attractive, fund-able opportunity – set a budget, hire a competent firm or person and pay them to help you accomplish this.

Consulting services to get this right the first time, has nothing to do with capital raise.

Bottom line 2: Assume any “up front ‘broker’ fees” to arrange funding are frauds. Period (I’ve been dealing with these kind of people for a long time).

$4mm in up front fee frauds have come across my desk the past many months, especially since the real financial crash began to fall in September, 2008. In some cases we have been able to get the “up front fees” back on behalf of clients, even those fee’s that were wired offshore before the ink on the check was dry. We continue to work on others (leveraging RICO is a wonderful thing).

I have participated as an advisor to investors and as a decision panel member riding shotgun over the due diligence drill on companies seeking funding… during the past 12 months, the several organizations, equity firms, angels, family offices and high net worth individuals I’ve worked with have funded more than $30mm in start-ups, acquisitions and expansions – not one dime of any ‘up front fee’ was involved.

_________________________________________________

Greg George is Managing Partner of GTI Advisors; Threat Management Practice Group. A senior advisor to executives, business owners, private equity investors, M&A teams and transaction lawyers, Greg provides guidance on matters of enhanced due diligence research, threat analysis, security issues, actionable intelligence, fraud avoidance, and corporate espionage realities. For further information please visit http://gti-advisors.com or contact Greg directly: greg@gti-advisors.com