THE VAULT: Asset Protection, Cash Alternatives and Life Insurance – UPDATED

In the week ending august 14th another 24 Billion dollars left the securities market for the relative perceived safety of cash. These billions  of dollars simply added to the trillions of dollars already allocated that way because of fears of instability in the securities and real estate markets. 

This large liquidity position has not gone un-noticed, unfortunately many of those who noticed are those who would like to separate you from your wealth. They see an opportunity for litigation in your liquidity.   

 

Their timing couldn’t be worse, especially if you are like most successful Americans who have lost huge percentages of their net worth through home equity loss, stalled or negative investment momentum and decreased profits or compensation.

 

 

 

The “Vault” was developed out of a need to have additional options for clients who:

-Are unhappy with their current cash returns (earning less than 1% and getting taxed on even that);

-Have concerns about the stability and FDIC insurance limits on banks and various govt. bonds given the debt crisis     (See this article on bank solvency Risk in the Wall Street Journal)  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904800304576478872384312208.html ;

-Have a need for Asset protection due their net worth, visibility and professional liability, or some combination thereof;

-Understandably have larger than normal cash positions because they are afraid of both R.E. and securities                             (See this article on ”Why Investors Should Worry About Money Market Funds: the Wall Street Journal)  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304520804576343093940388186.html ;

-Like having additional death benefit (10 to 20 times deposit amount if something happens to you);

-Like relying on the statutes in their state or the well proven operation of law as an additional way to hedge risk;

-Had an absolute desire to have a true, fully liquid cash alternative.

 

FAQs:

Q: Why haven’t I heard of this before or through my local advisors?

A: We have been using this strategy for a number of years and it was developed as part of our narrowly focused practice in the area of Asset Protection and wealth preservation. Most financial advisors are (rightly) focused on turning nickles into dimes (growth). Our clients are typically affluent and successful and while they value growth make loss prevention an even higher priority. They understand that the current economic environment makes KEEPING existing dollars even more important than chasing new ones.

Q: Can my advisors do this?

A: Only if they  have access to the specific, specially selected policies, knowledge and legal structures we describe and use. These policies are designed and chosen to benefit the client and provide maximum liquidity and protection based in the law, not to benefit the advisor and their bottom line and commission. Most advisors DO NOT even have the ability to use the best policies this way, its takes special permission and qualification.

Q: My advisor says he has something just as good. 

A: Our search for viable alternatives and options for those we work with has been exhaustive. He’s most likely selling you what he has on his shelf and not disclosing the features that his version is missing which are often fatal to your planning. We are working with specially qualified and trained advisors across the country and can get you the best informed help.

 

Note: this article originally appeared in WORTH magazine,

you can see the original here: http://www.box.net/shared/iyb9kea6yr

“What is an alternative to my current cash position that will protect my money from litigation?”

 

In our current economic environment, all clients want their money both safe and liquid.

When most people consider “safe” and “liquid,” they immediately think of their bank. However, what most people do not know is that their checking or savings account is unprotected from a very real threat: the exposure to an increasingly hostile and predatory litigation system. Consider this:

There are tens of thousands of lawsuits filed each day in this country. The average legal cost of defending a frivolous lawsuit is $91,000, plus the settlement amount itself. The number of lawsuits increases in tough economic times as people look to your wealth as an additional source of income.

Our team often takes commonly used tools and redesigns them to provide protection of client assets, while allowing clients to retain control and liquidity. This where the sciences of Financial Planing and Asset Protection meet. The situations below demonstrate the benefits of a strategy we are using in which we take a universal life insurance policy and design it to provide 98 to 102 percent cash surrender value in the first year.

Current Situation—Cash in the Bank: A healthy 45-year-old male client has a bank checking account with $1 million. He rarely uses this account, but he keeps his money there because he likes to have a certain amount of funds liquid in case he needs to access it quickly.

Here is how a regular, personally held bank account works:
· The account earns about 1 percent interest per year, with income taxable as ordinary income.
· If the client is sued for any reason and loses, the judge can require the transfer of the assets from the client’s checking account and into the plaintiff’s pockets.
· If the client dies, the named beneficiaries will receive the $1 million minus the taxes due.
· If the client needs to use the money, he is able to take the amount needed.

BETTER: Creditor-Protected Cash Alternative:
The strategy our team has designed allows the same client to place the $1 million into a specially designed universal life insurance policy by paying a premium amount of $500,000 in each of the first two years.

The policy will provide the following benefits:
· The account will earn a net interest of about 1 percent annually invested in the policy’s fixed account, and the gains are allowed to grow tax-deferred. If the client is sued for any reason and loses, the money in this account is 100 percent creditor-protected from day one.
· If the client dies, the named beneficiaries will receive a death benefit of $10,624,682, the face amount associated with this specific example, free of any estate taxes.
· If the client needs to withdraw all or part of the money in the account, he is able to do so at anytime with no fees or surrender charges, and he will have access to the money within a week. To Summarize the benefits again:

- Creditor Protection

- Wealth Multiplier Effect of 10X (in this illustration)

- Liquidity and borrowing options with no penalty

- Death benefit of $10MM plus that passes outside the estate and free of estate tax

My thanks to Insurance and Investing Expert Jeff Christenson for his help on the technical details of the insurance policy. Together we implement this strategy for clients and advisors nationwide.

Due Dilligence and Why the Background Check You Used Won’t Work

   

Due Dilligence Expert Greg George

Due Diligence is a commonly overlooked or underestimated  tool, and a an essential plan of any business venture or financial entanglement, especially now in the golden age of fraud. One of my top resources for clients is Greg George of GTI Advisors, he shares some exeprt insight on the false comfort of commercially available background checks below.  – Ike Devji  

There is No Such Thing as a ‘National’ Criminal Background Check for $29.95

A comprehensive background investigation is a must do for principals involved with various business transactions, private investments, bringing in new partners, examining suppliers and reviewing key hires for your company.  In spite of what many background screening companies across the country claim and try to sell you, there is no such thing as a “National Criminal Record Database Check for $29.95.”  
Although our firm does enjoy privileged access when undertaking criminal investigations on behalf of corporate clients and working with law enforcement, the data compiled by the National Crime Information Computer (NCIC), maintained by the FBI, the Law Enforcement Information Network (LEIN), maintained by each individual state, and other government information assembled by law enforcement on criminal matters IS NOT AVAILABLE for sale to private industry, and such sale or unauthorized access would violate both federal and state law. 
   

Best [research] methods for decision makers in the private sector to verify identity and achieve optimum results for criminal and civil record research in the U. S. include the following. A different criteria is applied when researching offshore issues, depending upon the country, the culture, and other specifics.  

  • Verify the subject’s social security number. This will show that the SSN was actually issued to this person as well as when and where it was issued.
  • Hand-search county court records in each jurisdiction where the subject has resided based on his or her address history. The statistical example: 85% of all arrests and convictions occur in the county of residence. However, take care when selecting your research supplier – they should be able to provide thorough research coverage extending to all 3,227 (or so, at last count) state counties, independent cities and township or village corporations across the United States.
  • Complete a federal criminal records search. A federal conviction or other information which indicates the subject may be or has been involved with federal authorities will not be revealed in a state county records check.
  • Narrow an online search of the thousands of news feeds for an arrest hit, if found, verify disposition of charges at the court of proper jurisdiction.
  • Become familiar with the Fair Credit Reporting Act – “FCRA”, available online prior to hiring employees. Any background research for employment purposes, (including obtaining a credit report), requires a separate stand-alone written release from the candidate. Most states have adopted the FCRA model in their respective legislation and several states also have further compliance mandates you need to follow. For due diligence review matters regarding private equity closings and other consumer initiated commercial transactions, the rules are a little different.

Specific purpose due diligence and employment background research can take on many forms, requiring various criteria to be addressed. My firm has provided research services ranging from basic criminal records reviews up through full field background investigations. Depending on the specific industry and employment position being filled (primarily corporate-level, financial, scientific, and other key staff positions), we may also recommend conducting additional interviews of past employers, business partners, neighbors, and other associates.
   

Suggested Baseline Criteria for Background Research on Individuals
Regarding due diligence research for investment, joint venture, merger, acquisition, other partnership opportunities or a key hire our recommended research criteria varies depending upon the specific industry.  However, here is what I suggest as a common baseline to examine for all individuals:  

  • Identity verification.
  • Criminal convictions.
  • History of civil litigation as plaintiff or defendant.
  • Bankruptcies, liens, judgments, and other adverse filings.
  • Past business associations, employment verification and reference interviews.
  • Verification of colleges and schools attended and highest degree awarded.
  • Global financial intelligence network lookouts on persons and businesses; alert reporting data: U.S. Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Interpol lookouts (Special attention to Asia, Russia, European Union) and comply with U.S. Patriot Act requirements.
  • Check for U.S. Treasury Office of Foreign Asset Control sanctioned/disallowed persons and businesses BEFORE you commit to hiring or to any transaction, anywhere.
  • Verification and review of regulatory sanctions and disciplinary actions regarding professional licensing.
  • When an individual is associated with a company you’re considering doing business with, review the company’s standing, fictitious names found, various filings, and officers listed when doing research on private or closely held businesses as either a separate engagement or along with individuals under review. Utilize the same recommended research strategy for individuals regarding fraud alerts and research for other adverse filings the company may be involved with.
  • Deep media research for articles about the individual or company

Deeper Research May Provide Undisclosed Information You Should Know About
Our firm recently provided due diligence research for a venture capital firm based in Southern Florida. During our engagement, we discovered one principal on the management team of the company seeking funding was a medical doctor under investigation by state licensing authorities regarding several complaints.  This investigation may lead to disciplinary action or criminal charges against the doctor. The existence of the state investigation was not initially disclosed to the venture capital firm.  If the venture capital firm had not ‘looked’ before they closed on the deal, an adverse outcome of the state review could have affected the credibility of the investment firm and become a formidable liability if investment money had already been given to this new medical technology company.  
My experience with government services, particularly consulting on investigations and reviews of candidates applying for sensitive positions requiring U.S. Government security clearances, a clear dis-qualifier for most is when information is not voluntarily disclosed and discussed up front. People make mistakes; this does not mean they’re bad people. And, events do occur in life requiring each of us to face many challenges at times, such as a medical bankruptcy or other factors resulting in unforeseen financial distress.  
Criteria for refusal of a candidate should not be automatic upon the disclosure/discovery of negative or potentially adverse information. A frank discussion with the candidate or potential business partner to review background information is certainly appropriate. If you choose to proceed after these discussions, remember – trust is important, but verify.  


In addition to vetting people and companies before engaging, clients often consult with us to assist with composing appropriate language to include in funding term sheets that address “contingent upon outcome of background review” or other related stipulations. As part of our assistance, we urge our clients to at least seek an initial background reviews before committing much time, resources, and effort to their quest.  All things considered, the costs of background research are nominal and analysis of the results provides a significant tool to support informed decisions.
_______________________________________________________
Greg George is a senior advisor to professional services firms, CxO’s, investors, family office groups, and global banking center directors.  Greg’s firm operates an intelligence fusion center available to private sectors providing investigative and operational due diligence analysis, and guidance addressing security operations, fraud, compliance, internal investigations and countering insider and espionage threats.  Greg can be contacted by email: greg@gti-advisors.com or visit http://gti-advisors.com